The Laws…
Now the season’s ended, one of the popular discussions in the clubhouses are the Laws of the game and how they’re working, and what needs changing. Certainly it’s a question always posed to me and one I do try and side step! However, this week I thought I comment on a few areas I believe are working and some that perhaps could do with some massaging. I would point out though that these are the views of Nigel Owens on a personal level, and have nothing to do with my employers, the WRU.
In the last few years, we’ve probably seen more Law changes than we’ll see for the next 100 years! However, this is part of the change of rugby and the move to a better spectator sport and, as the marketing people say, a better product. If you look at the last season, there were some titanic games of rugby and some very attractive ones. This tells me that the Laws are basically fine, and it’s now more to do with their application and, importantly, the players’ attitude, than anything else. If both of these are in order, then you’ll get a good game of rugby. I think we’re well past the dark days of the ELV’s and certainly I think the tackle/contact area laws are very well sorted and we’re seeing some real attacking intent as a result of that.
One of the areas that does frustrate me a little is the scrum. It amazes me how variable this can be, and perhaps I’d like to see one level of the Crouch Touch Pause Engage process removed- Crouch Hold Engage being more suitable in my eyes. It’ is all about rhythm and I think that longer hold/pause time actually can unbalance the players as they struggle to hold pressure coming through them. So, certainly, if the IRB removed on layer from that process, I’d not complain.
Another thought I have is that, in order to again speed the game up, when the ball alights at the back of the ruck I believe there should be a ‘use it or lose it’ policy applied to the half back or acting half back. Maybe a 5 second option, but certainly not the 20 and 30 seconds we now see when sides want to arrange pods or run down the clock. I feel this would inject pace into the re-cycling process and that would benefit the attractiveness of the game.
On the Ruckingball forums, one of our posters also raised an interesting point regarding knock ons close to the goal line, and again I think this is something we could look at. When an attacking side knocks on over the try line and the ball is touched down, I believe the defenders should have the option of defensive scrum 5 or 22 drop. This would inhibit sides with a much more powerful scrum from simply re winning the ball from their own mistake in a prime attacking position. This happened in the Gloucester/Saints game, where Hartley knocked on over the try line, and Gloucester then were awarded a defending scrum. Lo and behold, Saints’ front row superiority won the ball back and they scored from it. Had Gloucester had the option they would have taken the 22 drop and cleared their lines. I think that having that option call available would give a better balance to the game.
In closing this article, it’s often said that for the very casual supporter, the biggest barrier to enjoying rugby is understanding the laws. On that basis, I’d prefer to keep them as consistent as possible and not to tinker, thus allowing the migrating watcher to get a feel for the Laws without them being changed just as he or she begins to get a grasp!
It is after all a spectator sport, and as I have tried to stress, there’s not a lot wrong with the game as it is. Provided sides and refs both have a positive attitude and want to play rugby, I believe we’re in a very good place right at this moment in time.
Cheers for now,
Nige.







